SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barbara Dunn

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,405 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge requires looking at both their long-term history and their most recent performance. Barbara Dunn has a lifetime approval rate of 70%, which sits within the 35% to 70% range observed among judges at the Pasadena office. In the latest reporting period, her 74% approval rate exceeds the office-wide average of 67% by 7 percentage points. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,405
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dunn Pasadena National
Approval rate 74% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 67%
Denials 26%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dunn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dunn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Barbara Dunn has issued 3,405 decisions. Her approval rate has shown a notable upward trend over the last several years, rising from a lower point in 2019 to reach 80% in 2022, before stabilizing near 74% in the most recent period. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that the judge's current decision-making remains aligned with her recent historical performance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dunn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pasadena hearing office

The Pasadena hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a key hub for disability adjudications in California. The office maintains a bench of 11 judges who handle a high volume of cases, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 67%. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Pasadena Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Pasadena hearing office currently has 11 judges on record since 2016, with 5 judges actively reporting in the latest SSA data. Because the Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge. Approval rates across the office bench vary significantly, ranging from 35% to 70% lifetime. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions