All SSA Administrative Law Judges — Approval Rates and Decision Counts

Unable to work?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.

Every SSA Administrative Law Judge, Ranked

ALJs ranked by lifetime approval rate and performance score.

Showing 1–100 of 2044 judges
Office
Approval Rate
93%
Decisions
1,975
Approval Rate
94%
Decisions
866
Approval Rate
93%
Decisions
1,210
Approval Rate
92%
Decisions
239
Approval Rate
90%
Decisions
507
Approval Rate
90%
Decisions
2,949
Approval Rate
90%
Decisions
1,051
Office
Approval Rate
90%
Decisions
155
Approval Rate
89%
Decisions
2,464
Approval Rate
89%
Decisions
1,216
Office
Approval Rate
89%
Decisions
1,600
Office
Approval Rate
89%
Decisions
303
Office
Approval Rate
88%
Decisions
1,318
Approval Rate
88%
Decisions
1,756
Approval Rate
88%
Decisions
176
Approval Rate
88%
Decisions
4,253
Approval Rate
88%
Decisions
1,546
Approval Rate
87%
Decisions
987
Approval Rate
86%
Decisions
1,162
Approval Rate
86%
Decisions
2,256
Office
Approval Rate
86%
Decisions
1,638
Approval Rate
86%
Decisions
1,997
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
253
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
1,812
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
1,082
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
1,269
Office
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
4,173
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
214
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
280
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
816
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
1,139
Approval Rate
85%
Decisions
303
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
2,751
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
953
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
3,804
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
201
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
655
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
2,853
Office
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
124
Office
Approval Rate
84%
Decisions
1,875
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
3,041
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
1,717
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
284
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
2,082
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
3,115
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
807
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
929
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
1,939
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
3,516
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
372
Office
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
149
Approval Rate
83%
Decisions
2,162
Office
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
3,288
Office
WHITE PLAINS
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
1,244
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
2,654
Office
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
3,573
Office
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
2,056
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
3,572
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
2,390
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
1,028
Office
Approval Rate
82%
Decisions
1,070
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,254
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
895
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
776
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
1,882
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
4,452
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
3,539
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
4,817
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,711
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,414
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,227
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
3,013
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,887
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
2,823
Office
Approval Rate
81%
Decisions
1,800
Office
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
372
Office
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
2,690
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
1,727
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
3,569
Office
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
312
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
4,173
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
3,734
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
965
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
4,095
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
1,047
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
1,702
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
846
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
833
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
1,094
Office
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
3,593
Office
CREVE COEUR
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
104
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
420
Approval Rate
80%
Decisions
1,342
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
4,100
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
3,227
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
725
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
1,718
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
1,110
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
2,989
Office
Approval Rate
79%
Decisions
1,031
Rank Judge Office Approval Rate Decisions
1Michael C. Blanton SEATTLE, WA 93%1,975
2Ollie Garmon ATLANTA NORTH, GA 94%866
3Louis G. McAfoos III SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 93%1,210
4C. Rene Strong MONTGOMERY, AL 92%239
5Sara L. Alston NHC BALTIMORE, MD 90%507
6Paul L. Johnston TAMPA OHO, FL 90%2,949
7Edwin E. Kerstine JACKSON MS, MS 90%1,051
8Stanley Petraschuk DOVER, DE 90%155
9James A. Burke ALBUQUERQUE, NM 89%2,464
10E. Norman Graham GREENSBORO, NC 89%1,216
11Barry C. LaBoda ORLANDO, FL 89%1,600
12Stanley A. Moskal Jr. BUFFALO, NY 89%303
13Manuel del Valle SAN JUAN, PR 88%1,318
14Melinda McIntyre COVINGTON GA, GA 88%1,756
15Steven C. Smith GRAND RAPIDS, MI 88%176
16Charles Walters DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 88%4,253
17Douglas G. White KINGSPORT, TN 88%1,546
18James H. Scott CHARLESTON SC, SC 87%987
19Charles Bridges HARRISBURG, PA 86%1,162
20Glenn M. Embree ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 86%2,256
21John M. Lischak SYRACUSE, NY 86%1,638
22Matthew Malfa MANCHESTER, NH 86%1,997
23Larry A. Auerbach ATLANTA NORTH, GA 85%253
24Trace Baldwin OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 85%1,812
25S. A. Bryant WASHINGTON, DC 85%1,082
26Laurel J. Greene ST PETERSBURG FL, FL 85%1,269
27Jan Leventer QUEENS, NY 85%4,173
28Sharif F. Nesheiwat NEW YORK VARICK, NY 85%214
29Joseph Shortill PORTLAND ME, ME 85%280
30Maria L. Spitz GREENSBORO, NC 85%816
31M. Thayne Warner SALT LAKE CITY, UT 85%1,139
32Edward S. Zanaty BIRMINGHAM, AL 85%303
33Kerry J. Anzalone NEW ORLEANS, LA 84%2,751
34Bernadette Freeman OAK BROOK, IL 84%953
35Whitfield Haigler Jr. DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 84%3,804
36W. Gary Jewell CREVE COEUR 84%201
37Richard P. McCully ATLANTA NORTH, GA 84%655
38Daniel A. Piloseno Jr. TAMPA OHO, FL 84%2,853
39Sean P. Walsh BRONX, NY 84%124
40Major Williams Jr. OAKLAND, CA 84%1,875
41Brent T. Asseff CHARLOTTE, NC 83%3,041
42Leroy C. Bryant NHC BALTIMORE, MD 83%1,717
43Emily Cameron Shattil OMAHA, NE 83%284
44Jacqueline Y. Hall-Keith OAK PARK, MI 83%2,082
45Ronald Herman OAK PARK, MI 83%3,115
46Dennis R. Kramer VALPARAISO IN, IN 83%807
47Gary J. Lee HONOLULU, HI 83%929
48John D. McNamee-Alemany ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 83%1,939
49Yeline Quinones-Regalado SAN JUAN, PR 83%3,516
50John L. Shailer COLUMBUS, OH 83%372
51Thomas W. Snook MIAMI, FL 83%149
52Ronald L. Waldman LONG ISLAND, NY 83%2,162
53Bonny S. Barezky CHICAGO, IL 82%3,288
54John J. Barry WHITE PLAINS 82%1,244
55Henry H. Chambers CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 82%2,654
56Jeffrey A. Hatfield HONOLULU, HI 82%3,573
57Sanya Hill-Maxion STOCKTON, CA 82%2,056
58Aubri G. Masterson SANTA BARBARA, CA 82%3,572
59Laura G. McHenry CHATTANOOGA, TN 82%2,390
60Henry Oliver ELKINS PARK, PA 82%1,028
61Ramon E. Quinones SAN JUAN, PR 82%1,070
62Moira Ausems EUGENE, OR 81%2,254
63Millard L. Biloon SAVANNAH, GA 81%895
64Julian Cosentino CREVE COEUR 81%776
65Joseph R. Faraguna LONG ISLAND, NY 81%1,882
66Dawn M. Gruenburg OAK PARK, MI 81%4,452
67Paul F. Kelly ALBANY, NY 81%3,539
68Joseph Liken DALLAS NORTH OHO, TX 81%4,817
69William J. Mackowiak OAK BROOK, IL 81%2,711
70John R. Martin COLUMBIA SC, SC 81%2,414
71Marissa A. Pizzuto NEW YORK, NY 81%2,227
72Joani Sedaca NEW YORK, NY 81%3,013
73D. Burgess Stalley MOBILE, AL 81%2,887
74Michael R. Swan CHATTANOOGA, TN 81%2,823
75Jeffrey S. Wolfe TULSA, OK 81%1,800
76Joanne E. Adamczyk FLINT, MI 80%372
77Thomas A. Ciccolini AKRON OH, OH 80%2,690
78Donald R. Colpitts LAS VEGAS, NV 80%1,727
79Brian J. Crawley LONG ISLAND, NY 80%3,569
80Larry B. Creson MEMPHIS, TN 80%312
81David W. Engel TULSA OHO, OK 80%4,173
82Mary Forrest-Doyle WASHINGTON, DC 80%3,734
83James Garrett ELKINS PARK, PA 80%965
84Michael L. Harris OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 80%4,095
85Robert T. Jackson Jr. ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GA 80%1,047
86Scott T. Miller ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FL 80%1,702
87Katherine Morgan PORTLAND ME, ME 80%846
88John Murdock NHC FALLS CHURCH, DC 80%833
89Karen Patterson SOUTH JERSEY, NJ 80%1,094
90Margaret L. Pecoraro QUEENS, NY 80%3,593
91James K. Steitz CREVE COEUR 80%104
92Plauche F. Villere SACRAMENTO, CA 80%420
93Raymond J. Zadzilko JOHNSTOWN, PA 80%1,342
94Mary Abbondondelo SHREVEPORT, LA 79%4,100
95Andrea Addison JERSEY CITY, NJ 79%3,227
96Ronald L. Burton FORT SMITH, AR 79%725
97Robert M. Butler NHC ST LOUIS, MO 79%1,718
98Robert Egan CHARLOTTE, NC 79%1,110
99Milagros Farnes BALTIMORE, MD 79%2,989
100Thomas Grabeel NEW YORK, NY 79%1,031

Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Lifetime approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) reflects a judge's full career at SSA across all offices. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on lifetime allowance rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.

What Is an SSA Administrative Law Judge?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.

Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Over a career, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. Unlike the office you're assigned to, you cannot request a specific judge.

Why Individual Judge Stats Matter

The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate, fully favorable rate, and typical hearing style lets you and your attorney prepare testimony, line up medical evidence, and anticipate cross-examination in a way tailored to that specific judge.

If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).