Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 — analysis of SSA ALJ adult disability decisions, FY 2007–2015. Claimants with a representative were allowed benefits at a rate nearly three times higher than those without. Individual case outcomes vary based on medical evidence, the specific judge, and quality of representation.
ALJs ranked by approval rate on record. Judges with too few decisions to score are listed last.
| Rank | Judge | Most Recent Office | Approval Rate | Decisions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael C. Blanton | SEATTLE, WALast decision Sep 2021 | 93% | 1,975 | |
| 2 | Ollie Garmon | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2021 | 94% | 866 | |
| 3 | Louis G. McAfoos III | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Sep 2018 | 93% | 1,210 | |
| 4 | C. Rene Strong | MONTGOMERY, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 92% | 239 | |
| 5 | Sara L. Alston | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2017 | 90% | 507 | |
| 6 | Paul L. Johnston | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2022 | 90% | 2,949 | |
| 7 | Edwin E. Kerstine | JACKSON MS, MSLast decision Sep 2018 | 90% | 1,051 | |
| 8 | Stanley Petraschuk | DOVER, DELast decision Sep 2017 | 90% | 155 | |
| 9 | James A. Burke | ALBUQUERQUE, NMLast decision Sep 2020 | 89% | 2,464 | |
| 10 | E. Norman Graham | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Sep 2019 | 89% | 1,216 | |
| 11 | Barry C. LaBoda | ORLANDO, FLLast decision Sep 2020 | 89% | 1,600 | |
| 12 | Stanley A. Moskal Jr. | BUFFALO, NYLast decision Sep 2017 | 89% | 303 | |
| 13 | Manuel del Valle | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Sep 2019 | 88% | 1,318 | |
| 14 | Melinda McIntyre | COVINGTON GA, GALast decision Jul 2026 | 88% | 1,756 | |
| 15 | Steven C. Smith | GRAND RAPIDS, MILast decision Sep 2017 | 88% | 176 | |
| 16 | Charles Walters | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 88% | 4,253 | |
| 17 | Douglas G. White | KINGSPORT, TNLast decision Sep 2019 | 88% | 1,546 | |
| 18 | James H. Scott | CHARLESTON SC, SCLast decision Sep 2019 | 87% | 987 | |
| 19 | Charles Bridges | HARRISBURG, PALast decision Sep 2022 | 86% | 1,162 | |
| 20 | Glenn M. Embree | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2021 | 86% | 2,256 | |
| 21 | John M. Lischak | SYRACUSE, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 86% | 1,638 | |
| 22 | Matthew Malfa | MANCHESTER, NHLast decision Sep 2025 | 86% | 1,997 | |
| 23 | Larry A. Auerbach | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 85% | 253 | |
| 24 | Trace Baldwin | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Sep 2023 | 85% | 1,812 | |
| 25 | S. A. Bryant | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 85% | 1,082 | |
| 26 | Laurel J. Greene | ST PETERSBURG FL, FLLast decision Sep 2019 | 85% | 1,269 | |
| 27 | Jan Leventer | QUEENS, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 85% | 4,173 | |
| 28 | Sharif F. Nesheiwat | NEW YORK VARICK, NYLast decision Sep 2018 | 85% | 214 | |
| 29 | Joseph Shortill | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2017 | 85% | 280 | |
| 30 | Maria L. Spitz | GREENSBORO, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 85% | 816 | |
| 31 | M. Thayne Warner | SALT LAKE CITY, UTLast decision Jul 2026 | 85% | 1,139 | |
| 32 | Edward S. Zanaty | BIRMINGHAM, ALLast decision Sep 2017 | 85% | 303 | |
| 33 | Kerry J. Anzalone | NEW ORLEANS, LALast decision Sep 2023 | 84% | 2,751 | |
| 34 | Bernadette Freeman | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2020 | 84% | 953 | |
| 35 | Whitfield Haigler Jr. | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 84% | 3,804 | |
| 36 | W. Gary Jewell | CREVE COEURLast decision Sep 2016 | 84% | 201 | |
| 37 | Richard P. McCully | ATLANTA NORTH, GALast decision Sep 2017 | 84% | 655 | |
| 38 | Daniel A. Piloseno Jr. | TAMPA OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2023 | 84% | 2,853 | |
| 39 | Sean P. Walsh | BRONX, NYLast decision Sep 2016 | 84% | 124 | |
| 40 | Major Williams Jr. | OAKLAND, CALast decision Sep 2022 | 84% | 1,875 | |
| 41 | Brent T. Asseff | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Jul 2026 | 83% | 3,041 | |
| 42 | Leroy C. Bryant | NHC BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2020 | 83% | 1,717 | |
| 43 | Emily Cameron Shattil | OMAHA, NELast decision Sep 2016 | 83% | 284 | |
| 44 | Jacqueline Y. Hall-Keith | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2024 | 83% | 2,082 | |
| 45 | Ronald Herman | OAK PARK, MILast decision Sep 2024 | 83% | 3,115 | |
| 46 | Dennis R. Kramer | VALPARAISO IN, INLast decision Sep 2018 | 83% | 807 | |
| 47 | Gary J. Lee | HONOLULU, HILast decision Sep 2018 | 83% | 929 | |
| 48 | John D. McNamee-Alemany | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2021 | 83% | 1,939 | |
| 49 | Yeline Quinones-Regalado | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Jul 2026 | 83% | 3,516 | |
| 50 | John L. Shailer | COLUMBUS, OHLast decision Sep 2019 | 83% | 372 | |
| 51 | Thomas W. Snook | MIAMI, FLLast decision Sep 2016 | 83% | 149 | |
| 52 | Ronald L. Waldman | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Sep 2022 | 83% | 2,162 | |
| 53 | Bonny S. Barezky | CHICAGO, ILLast decision Sep 2025 | 82% | 3,288 | |
| 54 | John J. Barry | WHITE PLAINSLast decision Sep 2021 | 82% | 1,244 | |
| 55 | Henry H. Chambers | CHARLOTTESVILLE, VALast decision Sep 2022 | 82% | 2,654 | |
| 56 | Jeffrey A. Hatfield | HONOLULU, HILast decision Sep 2025 | 82% | 3,573 | |
| 57 | Sanya Hill-Maxion | STOCKTON, CALast decision Sep 2023 | 82% | 2,056 | |
| 58 | Aubri G. Masterson | SANTA BARBARA, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 82% | 3,572 | |
| 59 | Laura G. McHenry | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Jul 2026 | 82% | 2,390 | |
| 60 | Henry Oliver | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 82% | 1,028 | |
| 61 | Ramon E. Quinones | SAN JUAN, PRLast decision Sep 2019 | 82% | 1,070 | |
| 62 | Moira Ausems | EUGENE, ORLast decision Sep 2022 | 81% | 2,254 | |
| 63 | Millard L. Biloon | SAVANNAH, GALast decision Sep 2020 | 81% | 895 | |
| 64 | Julian Cosentino | CREVE COEURLast decision Sep 2018 | 81% | 776 | |
| 65 | Joseph R. Faraguna | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Sep 2020 | 81% | 1,882 | |
| 66 | Dawn M. Gruenburg | OAK PARK, MILast decision Jul 2026 | 81% | 4,452 | |
| 67 | Paul F. Kelly | ALBANY, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 81% | 3,539 | |
| 68 | Joseph Liken | DALLAS NORTH OHO, TXLast decision Jul 2026 | 81% | 4,817 | |
| 69 | William J. Mackowiak | OAK BROOK, ILLast decision Sep 2021 | 81% | 2,711 | |
| 70 | John R. Martin | COLUMBIA SC, SCLast decision Sep 2024 | 81% | 2,414 | |
| 71 | Marissa A. Pizzuto | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 81% | 2,227 | |
| 72 | Joani Sedaca | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 81% | 3,013 | |
| 73 | D. Burgess Stalley | MOBILE, ALLast decision Jul 2026 | 81% | 2,887 | |
| 74 | Michael R. Swan | CHATTANOOGA, TNLast decision Sep 2025 | 81% | 2,823 | |
| 75 | Jeffrey S. Wolfe | TULSA, OKLast decision Sep 2020 | 81% | 1,800 | |
| 76 | Joanne E. Adamczyk | FLINT, MILast decision Sep 2017 | 80% | 372 | |
| 77 | Thomas A. Ciccolini | AKRON OH, OHLast decision Sep 2021 | 80% | 2,690 | |
| 78 | Donald R. Colpitts | LAS VEGAS, NVLast decision Sep 2024 | 80% | 1,727 | |
| 79 | Brian J. Crawley | LONG ISLAND, NYLast decision Sep 2025 | 80% | 3,569 | |
| 80 | Larry B. Creson | MEMPHIS, TNLast decision Sep 2017 | 80% | 312 | |
| 81 | David W. Engel | TULSA OHO, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 4,173 | |
| 82 | Mary Forrest-Doyle | WASHINGTON, DCLast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 3,734 | |
| 83 | James Garrett | ELKINS PARK, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 80% | 965 | |
| 84 | Michael L. Harris | OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 4,095 | |
| 85 | Robert T. Jackson Jr. | ATLANTA DOWNTOWN, GALast decision Sep 2018 | 80% | 1,047 | |
| 86 | Scott T. Miller | ST PETERSBURG FL OHO, FLLast decision Sep 2021 | 80% | 1,702 | |
| 87 | Katherine Morgan | PORTLAND ME, MELast decision Sep 2018 | 80% | 846 | |
| 88 | John Murdock | NHC FALLS CHURCH, DCLast decision Sep 2020 | 80% | 833 | |
| 89 | Karen Patterson | SOUTH JERSEY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 1,094 | |
| 90 | Margaret L. Pecoraro | QUEENS, NYLast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 3,593 | |
| 91 | James K. Steitz | CREVE COEURLast decision Sep 2016 | 80% | 104 | |
| 92 | Plauche F. Villere | SACRAMENTO, CALast decision Jul 2026 | 80% | 420 | |
| 93 | Raymond J. Zadzilko | JOHNSTOWN, PALast decision Sep 2019 | 80% | 1,342 | |
| 94 | Mary Abbondondelo | SHREVEPORT, LALast decision Jul 2026 | 79% | 4,100 | |
| 95 | Andrea Addison | JERSEY CITY, NJLast decision Jul 2026 | 79% | 3,227 | |
| 96 | Ronald L. Burton | FORT SMITH, ARLast decision Sep 2017 | 79% | 725 | |
| 97 | Robert M. Butler | NHC ST LOUIS, MOLast decision Sep 2020 | 79% | 1,718 | |
| 98 | Robert Egan | CHARLOTTE, NCLast decision Sep 2020 | 79% | 1,110 | |
| 99 | Milagros Farnes | BALTIMORE, MDLast decision Sep 2025 | 79% | 2,989 | |
| 100 | Thomas Grabeel | NEW YORK, NYLast decision Sep 2018 | 79% | 1,031 |
Data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Hearings Operations disposition records. Approval rate (SSA's term is allowance rate) covers every decision in SSA's published disposition record for the judge, across all offices — SSA's published record, not a judge's entire time on the bench. Performance score is calculated by ClaimsBoost — it is the judge's percentile rank on that approval rate among all ranked judges, and nothing else. It does not weigh caseload or consistency.
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) at the Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations are the federal officials who decide disability appeals. When your initial SSDI or SSI claim is denied, your appeal is assigned to an ALJ at the hearing office serving your area. That judge independently reviews your medical evidence, holds a hearing where you and your representative can present testimony, questions a vocational expert about jobs you could still perform, and issues a written decision on whether you qualify for benefits.
Each ALJ has their own style, pace, and tendencies. Some weigh objective medical evidence heavily; others give significant weight to claimant testimony about daily activities. Across thousands of decisions, these differences show up as measurable variation in approval rates — some judges approve 80%+ of cases while others approve under 30%. SSA assigns your judge — you cannot request a specific one.
The judge assigned to your case is one of the strongest predictors of the outcome. The same case evidence can produce a favorable decision from one ALJ and a denial from another at the same office. Knowing an individual judge's historical approval rate — and, where SSA reports it, their fully favorable rate — shows how that judge's record compares with their office, their state, and the nation. It does not predict your case: the strength of your medical evidence still decides it.
If you have a hearing scheduled, a free benefits review takes two minutes and can help you understand your options — especially whether representation is worth the contingency fee (capped by SSA at 25% of back pay or $9,200, whichever is less).
Dealing with disability or injury? Get your free benefits review.
How ClaimsBoost is paid: ClaimsBoost is free for consumers to use. Participating law firms pay ClaimsBoost.