SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas J. Helget

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 5,329 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating a judge's record, it is helpful to look at both their long-term history and their most recent performance. Thomas J. Helget has a lifetime approval rate of 45% across 5,329 decisions, while the Houston North hearing office bench shows a wide range of lifetime approval rates from 34% to 64%. In the latest reporting period, Thomas J. Helget recorded a 53% approval rate, which sits 3 percentage points below the office-wide latest-period average.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 5,329
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Helget Houston North National
Approval rate 53% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 49%
Denials 47%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Helget's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Helget
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Thomas J. Helget shows an upward trend since 2016. After starting with a 36% approval rate in 2016, the figures have generally climbed, reaching 53% in the most recent 2026 reporting period. This latest performance represents a shift from his lifetime average of 45%, reflecting recent changes in his decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Helget's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Houston North hearing office

The Houston North hearing office serves applicants throughout the Texas region. With a bench of 12 judges on record, this office manages a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period is 56%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is effectively random. There are 12 judges on record at the Houston North hearing office since 2016, with 9 currently reporting in the latest SSA file. These judges demonstrate a broad spectrum of approval rates, ranging from 34% to 64% over their respective careers.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions