SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Troy Silva

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Bernardino Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,393 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Silva?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Silva currently maintains a 64% approval rate in the latest reporting period, which aligns with the San Bernardino Hearing Office average of 63% and exceeds the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 17,393 lifetime decisions, offering a reliable look at historical trends.

Metric Judge Silva San Bernardino National
Approval rate 63% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Silva's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Silva
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over your 10-year tenure, you have demonstrated a consistent approach to disability claims. While your approval rate has fluctuated—notably reaching 74% in 2023—the overall trend reflects a stable decision-making philosophy. The latest period shows a 64% approval rate, which is consistent with your long-term performance. These patterns suggest you evaluate evidence based on established Social Security Administration standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Silva's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Silva? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Bernardino hearing office

The San Bernardino Hearing Office serves a large population across Southern California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 63%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the San Bernardino Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the San Bernardino Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 52% to 64%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the courtroom, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions