SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Chandreka Allen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the St Louis Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 13,504 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Allen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both lifetime consistency and recent trends. Judge Allen has maintained a 48% approval rate over a decade of service, while the St Louis office currently averages 54%. These figures provide a baseline for understanding the local hearing environment, though they do not account for the unique medical evidence in your specific claim. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Allen St Louis National
Approval rate 48% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 49%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Allen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Allen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Allen has seen notable shifts in approval patterns. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2020, the data shows a recovery in recent years, with 2024 reaching a 65% approval rate. This suggests that the judge's approach to evidence may evolve alongside changes in case complexity or policy. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern of adjustment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Allen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Allen? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

The St Louis Hearing Office serves a large population in Missouri and maintains a busy docket of disability claims. With 6 judges currently presiding, the office handles a high volume of cases to ensure timely access to hearings. The office-wide latest approval rate is 54%, reflecting the regional landscape of disability adjudication. You can see the St Louis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the St Louis office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 41% to 70%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms. You can find more information on the St Louis Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions