SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel Benjamin

Last decided San BernardinoJul 2026
Decisions 1,694since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

To understand how Daniel Benjamin compares to the broader bench, you can look at both long-term records and recent performance. The judge's 52% approval rate since 2017 sits within the 52% to 64% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is San Bernardino. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 68% approval rate outperformed the office rate of 61%, the state rate of 61%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures reflect past trends rather than future outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 1,694
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Benjamin San Bernardino National
Approval rate 68% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Benjamin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Benjamin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Daniel Benjamin has shown an upward trend in recent years. After fluctuating between 47% and 56% during the 2018 to 2022 period, the rate climbed to 60% in 2023 and reached 71% in 2025. The 2026 fiscal year to date shows a continuation of this pattern at 69%. This recent shift marks a change from the historical average of 52% across the 1,694 decisions on record since 2017.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Benjamin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Bernardino hearing office

Daniel Benjamin's most recent office on record is the San Bernardino hearing office, which serves you in California. This office is part of a regional network tasked with processing disability claims, and it currently maintains an office-wide approval rate of 61% for the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Bernardino

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 5 judges whose most recent office on record is San Bernardino. Approval rates for this bench range from 52% to 64% based on records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions