SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shiva Bozarth

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fresno Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,119 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks helps you understand the statistical landscape of your hearing. Judge Bozarth maintains a lifetime approval rate of 64%, which currently tracks 2 points above the Fresno office average of 62% and 6 points above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 17,119 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Bozarth Fresno National
Approval rate 64% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 35%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bozarth's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bozarth
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Bozarth has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. The most recent reporting period shows a 65% approval rate, reflecting a steady pattern in the evaluation of evidence and testimony. This stability suggests a predictable process for how your case will be reviewed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bozarth's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Bozarth? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fresno hearing office

The Fresno Hearing Office serves a diverse population across California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 62%, the facility operates as a critical hub for regional SSDI processing. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of your case outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Fresno Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 73%. This variance highlights why understanding the specific requirements of your case is more important than focusing solely on the judge's identity.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions