Shiva Bozarth is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Fresno Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 64% over 17,119 decisions. This sits above the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, the judge you draw matters, but aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the standards expected in this office.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks helps you understand the statistical landscape of your hearing. Judge Bozarth maintains a lifetime approval rate of 64%, which currently tracks 2 points above the Fresno office average of 62% and 6 points above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 17,119 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bozarth's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Bozarth has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. The most recent reporting period shows a 65% approval rate, reflecting a steady pattern in the evaluation of evidence and testimony. This stability suggests a predictable process for how your case will be reviewed.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bozarth's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Bozarth? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Fresno hearing office
The Fresno Hearing Office serves a diverse population across California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 62%, the facility operates as a critical hub for regional SSDI processing. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of your case outcome.
Other judges at this hearing office
The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Fresno Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 73%. This variance highlights why understanding the specific requirements of your case is more important than focusing solely on the judge's identity.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
