SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark A. Brown

Last decided St LouisSep 2019
Decisions 194since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge compares to their peers requires looking at data from the same period. The most relevant benchmark for Mark A. Brown is the 30% to 78% range seen among the 20 judges whose most recent office on record is St Louis. With 194 decisions on record since 2016, the data provides a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 194

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Brown. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Brown's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Brown
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mark A. Brown has fluctuated across the 194 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial 73% approval rate in 2016, the figures rose to 82% in 2017 before settling at 75% in 2018 and 65% in 2019. These variations reflect the specific medical evidence presented during those years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Brown's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

Mark A. Brown's most recent office on record is the St Louis hearing office. This office features a bench of 20 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is paramount to the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Louis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is St Louis, with approval rates ranging from 30% to 78% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions