SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Felicia D. Burkes

Last decided HattiesburgJul 2026
Decisions 3,967since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. Felicia D. Burkes's 28% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 25% to 76% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Hattiesburg. In the latest reporting period, her 29% approval rate differs from the office, state, and national averages. These figures rely on a significant volume of decisions to provide a stable statistical picture.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 28%
Decisions on record 3,967
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Burkes Hattiesburg National
Approval rate 29% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 24% — —
Denials 71% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Burkes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Burkes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Felicia D. Burkes has issued 3,967 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 13% in 2016 to 29% in the 2026 fiscal year to date. This pattern indicates that while there is year-to-year variance, the approach has remained within a consistent range over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Burkes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hattiesburg hearing office

The Hattiesburg Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Felicia D. Burkes as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 11 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 50%, the environment is one where evidence quality is critical to a favorable outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Hattiesburg

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Hattiesburg, and 7 of them decided cases there in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates among this bench vary widely, ranging from 25% to 76% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions