SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark A. Clayton

Last decided Springfield MOJul 2026
Decisions 3,444since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While Mark A. Clayton has a 35% approval rate on record since 2016, the broader bench at this office shows a range of 25% to 60%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 41% approval rate, which is 1 percentage point higher than the office-wide average of 40%. These figures are based on a volume of 3,444 decisions on record since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 35%
Decisions on record 3,444
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Clayton Springfield MO National
Approval rate 41% 40% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 59% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Clayton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Clayton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Mark A. Clayton has issued 3,444 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, with rates ranging from a low of 27% in 2020 to a high of 43% in 2023. The most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows an approval rate of 41%. This latest period reflects a continuation of the variance observed over the last decade. These patterns suggest that your case outcome is influenced by the specific evidence and medical documentation you present in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Clayton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Springfield MO hearing office

Mark A. Clayton's most recent office on record is the Springfield MO hearing office, which serves you across Missouri. This office includes a bench of 10 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 40%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment. For more information, see the Springfield MO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Springfield MO

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 25% to 60% on their since-2016 records. Four of these judges decided cases here in the latest file period ending July 2026. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions