SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Comisky

Last decided Kansas CityJul 2026
Decisions 3,577since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Michael Comisky's 44% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 33% to 77% range observed among the bench at the Kansas City office. In the most recent reporting period, his 45% approval rate is 11 percentage points lower than the office average of 56%. These figures are based on a substantial docket of 3,577 decisions, providing a stable view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,577
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Comisky Kansas City National
Approval rate 45% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Comisky's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Comisky
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Michael Comisky has shown notable fluctuation. After starting at 34% in 2016, the rate experienced a period of growth before seeing a decline in 2021. Recent years have seen a return to higher approval levels, with 54% in 2025, though the partial 2026 data shows a rate of 45%. This pattern suggests that recent decisions reflect a continuation of established variability rather than a singular, fixed trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Comisky's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

Michael Comisky's most recent office on record is the Kansas City Hearing Office. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kansas City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City office, 12 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 77% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions