SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Comisky

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Kansas City Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,091 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Comisky?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Comisky’s approval rate is calculated based on 21,091 lifetime decisions made over his 10-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, his 54% approval rate aligns with the Kansas City office average but remains 15 percentage points below the national average. These statistics provide a broad view of his judicial history, though they do not predict the outcome of any individual hearing.

Metric Judge Comisky Kansas City National
Approval rate 43% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Comisky's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Comisky
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Comisky has seen his approval rates fluctuate, ranging from a low of 29% in 2021 to 54% in 2025. This upward trend in recent years shows a departure from his historical average. Understanding these trends is helpful, but the strength of your medical evidence remains the most critical factor in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Comisky's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Comisky? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

The Kansas City (Missouri) Hearing Office serves a broad population across the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket that requires consistent case management. You can expect a formal process where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can visit the Kansas City (Missouri) Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Kansas City hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 28% to 61%. This variation highlights why it is important to focus on the merits of your own claim regardless of who is presiding.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions