SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alaina Davis

Last decided St LouisJul 2026
Decisions 934since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's 67% approval rate covers all decisions since October 2023, the latest-period data provides a more immediate snapshot. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 62% approval rate, which is 11 percentage points above the St Louis office average of 51%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a basis for comparison. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 934
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Davis St Louis National
Approval rate 62% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Alaina Davis has shifted across the 934 decisions on record since October 2023. After an approval rate of 67% in 2024 and 71% in 2025, the fiscal year-to-date rate for 2026 stands at 62%. This recent shift reflects the judge's activity in the latest period compared to the overall average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

Alaina Davis's most recent office on record is the St Louis hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across Missouri and the surrounding region. The bench consists of 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide approval rate for the latest period was 51%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Louis

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the St Louis office, there are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 13 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 30% to 78% on their respective records. You should prepare for your hearing with the expectation that your case will be evaluated on its own merits.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions