SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alma S. de Leon

Last decided PittsburghSep 2020
Decisions 1,286since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 74% approval rate for Alma S. DE Leon reflects her decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 28% to 74% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is Pittsburgh. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached their dockets. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 1,286

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge de Leon. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge de Leon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge de Leon
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Alma S. DE Leon has shown a steady trend across the 1,286 decisions on record since 2016. Starting at 69% in 2016, the annual approval rate grew to 78% by 2019 and remained at that level through 2020. This consistent pattern suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge de Leon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pittsburgh hearing office

Alma S. DE Leon's most recent office on record is the Pittsburgh hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Pittsburgh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and their approval rates on record since 2016 range from 28% to 74%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions