SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Osly F. Deramus

Last decided Rio Grande Valley TXSep 2021
Decisions 1,406since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Osly F. Deramus is calculated based on 1,406 decisions issued between January 2016 and September 2021. This figure is best understood by comparing it to the bench at the Rio Grande Valley TX office, where the 4 judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 40% to 65% approval on their records since 2016. Because the Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly, your specific hearing outcome depends more on the medical evidence in your file than on the judge's historical average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 1,406

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Deramus. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Deramus's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Deramus
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Osly F. Deramus has shown variation, beginning at 42% in 2016 and peaking at 52% in 2017. Following this, the rate saw a decline, reaching 32% in 2020 before returning to 42% in 2021. These 1,406 decisions reflect a fluctuating pattern rather than a steady trajectory. This data highlights how approval rates can shift over time, often influenced by changes in case volume or the specific evidence presented in individual claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Deramus's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Rio Grande Valley TX hearing office

Osly F. Deramus's most recent office on record is the Rio Grande Valley TX hearing office, with decisions there through September 2021. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 4 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the evaluation of medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Rio Grande Valley TX

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Rio Grande Valley TX office, there are 4 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 40% to 65% on their records since 2016. While these figures provide context for the office, they do not dictate the outcome of your specific hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions