SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jo Ann L. Draper

Last decided TupeloJul 2026
Decisions 2,543since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 33% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of the decision history, which you can compare against the 19% to 66% range of other judges at the Tupelo office. In the most recent reporting period, the 88% approval rate sits 20 points above the office average of 68%. These figures rely on a significant volume of 2,543 decisions on record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 2,543
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Draper Tupelo National
Approval rate 88% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 81% — —
Denials 12% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Draper's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Draper
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Jo Ann L. Draper has fluctuated over the years, starting at 41% in 2016 and moving through various cycles before reaching 88% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 2,543 decisions on record since 2016, the data shows a pattern that shifted significantly in the most recent period compared to the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Draper's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tupelo hearing office

The most recent office on record for Jo Ann L. Draper is the Tupelo hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges who handle a wide variety of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tupelo

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tupelo office. Approval rates among this bench range from 19% to 66% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions