Jo Ann L. Draper's most recent office on record is the Tupelo hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 2,543 decisions on record since January 2016, 33% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 19% to 66% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for the specific requirements of this bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 33% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of the decision history, which you can compare against the 19% to 66% range of other judges at the Tupelo office. In the most recent reporting period, the 88% approval rate sits 20 points above the office average of 68%. These figures rely on a significant volume of 2,543 decisions on record.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Draper's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Jo Ann L. Draper has fluctuated over the years, starting at 41% in 2016 and moving through various cycles before reaching 88% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 2,543 decisions on record since 2016, the data shows a pattern that shifted significantly in the most recent period compared to the long-term average.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Draper's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Tupelo hearing office
The most recent office on record for Jo Ann L. Draper is the Tupelo hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges who handle a wide variety of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in your decision.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tupelo
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tupelo office. Approval rates among this bench range from 19% to 66% on their records since 2016.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Judge Draper has a 33% approval rate on record since 2016. Other judges at the Tupelo office have since-2016 approval rates ranging from 19% to 66%. An attorney can help you prepare your case for the specific requirements of this bench.
The approval rate for Judge Draper has varied over time, ranging from a low of 24% in 2021 to 88% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These fluctuations are common in SSA data. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific claim.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot select your judge, it is important to focus on building a strong case with the help of an attorney.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You will likely be asked about your work history and how your impairments limit your daily activities. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your evidence.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. While the 33% rate on record since 2016 provides context, the outcome of your case depends primarily on the medical evidence you provide. An attorney can help you ensure your evidence is as strong as possible.




