F. T. Eckert Jr.'s most recent SSA record (January 2016 to September 2016) is at the St Petersburg FL hearing office. Across 336 decisions on record since 2016, 75% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 35% to 85% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 75% approval rate for F. T. Eckert Jr. reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 35% to 85% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL location. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached disability claims.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Eckert Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eckert Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for F. T. Eckert Jr. is based on 336 decisions on record since 2016. During the 2016 window, the judge maintained an approval rate of 75%. Because this data covers a specific period ending in 2016, it represents a historical snapshot of the judge's activity at the St Petersburg FL office. Your individual case results depend on the specific medical evidence and vocational factors you present.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eckert Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the St Petersburg FL hearing office
F. T. Eckert Jr.'s most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL hearing office, where the judge recorded decisions through September 2016. This office serves you and other claimants across Florida and is part of a region with a diverse bench of 17 judges. You can expect a formal hearing process where your medical documentation and vocational testimony are central to the decision.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Petersburg FL
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 35% to 85% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the broader office bench is helpful.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
F. T. Eckert Jr. has a 75% approval rate on record since 2016. This sits within the 35% to 85% range observed among the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL location. An attorney can help you understand how your specific case evidence aligns with these historical patterns.
The data on record for F. T. Eckert Jr. covers the period from January 2016 to September 2016, during which the judge maintained a 75% approval rate across 336 decisions. Because the data window for this judge concludes in 2016, there are no more recent trends to report. A qualified attorney can help you evaluate how current case law might impact your hearing.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency across hearing offices. Since you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the best way to prepare for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your evidence.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and may hear testimony from you, medical experts, or vocational experts. The judge's role is to determine if your condition meets the strict criteria for disability benefits. Having an attorney can help you prepare your testimony and ensure your medical records are properly presented.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. While F. T. Eckert Jr. has a 75% approval rate on record since 2016, every case is unique and depends on the specific evidence you provide. An attorney can help you build a case that addresses the specific requirements of the Social Security Administration.




