SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Donald G. Smith

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the St Petersburg Fl Oho Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 29,597 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Smith?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Smith maintains a lifetime approval rate of 57% based on 29,597 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded an approval rate of 64%, which compares to the office average of 63% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical look at the judge's history over a decade of service. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Smith St Petersburg Fl Oho National
Approval rate 57% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, your judge's yearly approval rates have fluctuated between a low of 50% in 2022 and a high of 63% in 2025. The trend shows a period of decline between 2018 and 2022, followed by a recent recovery in approval frequency. This latest period reflects a continuation of a more recent upward trend in approvals compared to the mid-tenure dip.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Smith? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Petersburg Fl Oho hearing office

The St Petersburg FL OHO serves you across the Florida region, managing a high volume of disability cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 63%, reflecting the local administrative environment. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the St Petersburg FL OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the St Petersburg FL OHO, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 38% to 75%. This variance highlights why understanding the general environment of your hearing office is useful.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions