SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Donald G. Smith

Last decided St Petersburg Fl OHOJul 2026
Decisions 4,773since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes. While the 57% approval rate since 2016 provides a long-term view, the latest-period data offers a snapshot of recent trends. In the most recent reporting period, Donald G. Smith approved 69% of cases, which is 6 points higher than the office average of 63%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing statistical context for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 4,773
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Smith St Petersburg Fl OHO National
Approval rate 69% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 63% — —
Denials 31% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Donald G. Smith has issued 4,773 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 58% in 2016 to 69% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. After a period of lower approval rates between 2019 and 2022, recent data indicates an upward shift in favorable outcomes. This latest period reflects a continuation of this recent pattern of increased approvals compared to the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Petersburg Fl OHO hearing office

Donald G. Smith's most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL OHO, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Florida region and maintains a bench of 17 judges. The office-wide latest approval rate is 63%, reflecting the general environment for disability claims in this area. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Petersburg Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 35% to 85% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions