SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jerry Faust

Last decided NHC St LouisSep 2020
Decisions 1,647since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 50% approval rate for Jerry Faust reflects his entire record since 2016, which we measure against the 40% to 79% range of his peers at the same office during that same period. This statistical spread provides a clearer picture of the local bench than national averages alone.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 1,647

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Faust. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Faust isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over one period, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Faust's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Faust
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Jerry Faust has fluctuated over the 1,647 decisions on record since 2016. After a 48% approval rate in 2016, the figures shifted to 53% in 2017, followed by 48% in 2018, 53% in 2019, and 51% through the final partial year of data in 2020. This pattern shows a consistent approach to case evaluation over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Faust's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

The NHC St Louis office serves the Missouri region. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and work history at this office.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC St Louis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and they demonstrate a wide range of approval rates from 40% to 79%. This variation highlights why understanding the local bench is important for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions