SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffrey A. Ferguson

Last decided SavannahJul 2026
Decisions 2,524since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing the SSDI approval rate for Jeffrey A. Ferguson, it is helpful to compare his performance against the broader bench. While his overall rate on record since 2018 is 49%, the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Savannah Hearing Office show a wide range of outcomes, from 36% to 81%. In the most recent reporting period, his 40% approval rate sits 14 points below the office average of 54%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 2,524
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ferguson Savannah National
Approval rate 40% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 34% — —
Denials 60% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ferguson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ferguson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 2,524 decisions on record for Jeffrey A. Ferguson since 2018 reveal a fluctuating trend. After an initial approval rate of 72% in 2018, the figures shifted in subsequent years. The most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows a 40% approval rate, which is lower than his long-term average. This recent period reflects a departure from the stability seen in 2024, suggesting that case-specific evidence remains the primary driver of outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ferguson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Savannah hearing office

The Savannah Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Georgia and is a key location for regional SSDI hearings. With 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a steady volume of activity. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 54%, providing a benchmark for the region.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Savannah

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Savannah Hearing Office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Because approval rates across this bench range from 36% to 81%, understanding the local context is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions