SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James F. Gillet

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Springfield MO Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 13,132 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Gillet has presided over 13,132 lifetime decisions during his 9 years on the bench. His recent approval rate is 5 percentage points lower than the Springfield MO office average and 22 points below the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have historically been decided in his courtroom. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Gillet Springfield MO National
Approval rate 36% 41% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 64%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gillet's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gillet
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 9-year tenure, your judge's approval patterns have fluctuated, moving from 28% in 2016 to a peak of 51% in 2023. This trend indicates that his decision-making is not static and may respond to shifts in case complexity or the quality of evidence you present. The recent data suggests a period of higher approval activity compared to his earlier years on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gillet's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Gillet? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Springfield MO hearing office

The Springfield MO Hearing Office serves a broad population across Missouri, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 41% in the latest reporting period. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Gillet is essentially random. The 6 ALJs at the Springfield MO office show a lifetime approval-rate range between 27% and 48%, highlighting the variance present across the local bench. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your case, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain the same.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions