Matthew J. Gordon's most recent office on record is the Des Moines hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,674 decisions on record since September 2016, 63% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 37% to 70% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rates for Matthew J. Gordon are calculated based on 3,674 decisions on record since September 2016. When comparing these figures to the broader bench at the Des Moines office, note that the office's 10 judges range from 37% to 70% in their approval rates over the same period. Latest-period data shows you that the judge currently maintains a 65% approval rate, which sits 12 points above the office's latest-period average of 53%.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gordon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since September 2016, the approval trend for Matthew J. Gordon has remained consistent. After an initial period, your judge's annual approval rates have moved between 60% and 68%, with the most recent fiscal year-to-date data showing a 65% approval rate. This pattern reflects a stable approach to case evaluation over the last decade.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gordon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Des Moines hearing office
Matthew J. Gordon's most recent office on record is the Des Moines hearing office, which serves you across Iowa. This office is staffed by a bench of 10 judges who have recorded decisions since 2016. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 53%, providing a baseline for the region. You can see the Des Moines hearing office page for the full roster of judges.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Des Moines
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Des Moines office, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 70% since 2016.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Matthew J. Gordon has an approval rate of 63% since 2016, which sits within the 37% to 70% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Des Moines. An attorney can help you understand how these differences might impact your specific case strategy.
The approval rate for Matthew J. Gordon has remained relatively steady, with annual rates fluctuating between 60% and 68% over the last several years. While the latest-period rate is 65%, past performance is not a guarantee of future results. A qualified attorney can help you prepare for your hearing regardless of these trends.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a random workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot control your assignment, working with an attorney is the best way to ensure your evidence is ready for any judge.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You will likely answer questions about your work history and physical or mental limitations. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific questions this judge may ask.
A judge's approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and how well you document your limitations. An attorney can help you gather the necessary evidence to build a strong case.




