Robert Grant's most recent office on record is the Alexandria hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 4,626 decisions on record since 2016, 67% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 26% to 67% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Robert Grant maintains a 67% approval rate on record since 2016, the office bench shows a range of outcomes from 26% to 67%. In the most recent reporting period, Robert Grant's 68% approval rate sits 13 percentage points above the office average of 55%. These figures provide context for the statistical likelihood of outcomes, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than individual hearing predictions.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Robert Grant has issued 4,626 decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of growth, peaking with a 77% approval rate in 2023 before moderating toward the current 67% level. This latest period reflects a pattern that remains higher than the office and state benchmarks. While fluctuations occur, the data suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the last decade.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Alexandria hearing office
The Alexandria hearing office serves claimants across Louisiana and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, the office bench consists of 10 judges with varying approval patterns. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 55%, providing a baseline for the local hearing environment.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Alexandria
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 7 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this group vary, ranging from 26% to 67% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Robert Grant's latest-period approval rate of 68% is 13 percentage points higher than the Alexandria office average of 55%. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific standards of this hearing office.
Robert Grant's approval rate has fluctuated over time, starting at 61% in 2016 and reaching a high of 77% in 2023 before settling at 67% in the most recent partial year. An attorney can help you evaluate how your evidence aligns with these patterns.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm. Since you cannot choose your judge, an attorney can help you prepare for the hearing regardless of who is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where a judge reviews your medical evidence and testimony. You will likely answer questions about your work history and physical or mental limitations. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony to ensure your case is presented clearly.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Your success depends on the quality and completeness of your medical evidence. An attorney can help you gather the necessary documentation to build the strongest possible case.




