SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffrey W. Hart

Last decided MinneapolisJul 2026
Decisions 3,789since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating a judge's record, it is helpful to compare their performance against the broader bench at their most recent office. Jeffrey W. Hart maintains a 60% approval rate across 3,789 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 33% to 68% range observed among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,789
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hart Minneapolis National
Approval rate 62% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hart's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hart
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Jeffrey W. Hart has fluctuated since 2016. After an initial period of higher approval rates, the data shows a shift in the middle years before returning to a 62% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure represents a 10-point increase over the office's latest-period average of 52%.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hart's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

Jeffrey W. Hart's most recent office on record is Minneapolis, which serves claimants throughout Minnesota. This office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 52%. Claimants appearing at this office can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 68% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions