SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joseph L. Heimann

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the St Louis Hearing Office · 7 years on the bench · 9,376 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Heimann?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Joseph L. Heimann has presided over 9,376 lifetime decisions, establishing a stable statistical record. While his approval rate is currently 2 points below the St Louis office average and 6 points below the national average, these metrics are based on historical case mixes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Heimann St Louis National
Approval rate 52% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 48%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Heimann's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Heimann
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 7 years on the bench, Judge Joseph L. Heimann has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. His approval rates showed a gradual rise from 49% in 2016 to a peak of 54% in 2018, before stabilizing near the 53% mark through 2020. This steady trend indicates a judge who applies a reliable framework to the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Heimann's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Heimann? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

The St Louis Hearing Office serves a significant volume of claimants across Missouri. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a diverse caseload that requires careful adherence to Social Security Administration guidelines. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 54%, reflecting regional trends in disability adjudication. You can visit the St Louis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the St Louis Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 41% to 70%. Because of this variance, understanding the office environment is helpful, but the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions