SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gerald J. Hill

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Tacoma Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 4,543 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Hill?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Hill's lifetime approval rate of 36% is measured against the latest Tacoma Hearing Office average of 58% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 4,543 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual outcome.

Metric Judge Hill Tacoma National
Approval rate 36% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 64%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hill
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a three-year tenure, your judge's approval rate shifted from 70% in 2017 to 40% in 2018 and 32% in 2019. This trend across 4,543 lifetime decisions reflects the judge's recent output. While yearly fluctuations occur due to changes in case complexity or evidence standards, this trend serves as a baseline for understanding how your case may be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Hill? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tacoma hearing office

The Tacoma Hearing Office serves a large population across Washington, managing a high volume of SSDI claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an approval rate that reflects the diverse nature of the cases heard in this region. You can expect a formal process focused on the documentation of your impairments and work history. You can visit the Tacoma Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. Within the Tacoma office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 31% to 72%. This variance highlights why you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence regardless of your specific assignment.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions