SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gerald J. Hill

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 711 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for a judge is a probability cloud derived from their historical record, providing context for what to expect at your hearing. At the Tacoma hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 30% to 78%. With 711 lifetime decisions on record, the data for Gerald J. Hill offers a stable look at his historical decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 711

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hill. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hill
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Gerald J. Hill's record spans from 2017 to 2019, during which he issued 711 decisions. The data shows a shift in approval trends over this period, moving from a 67% approval rate in 2017 to 32% by 2019. This downward trend in approval frequency suggests that his recent decisions reflect a different pattern than his earlier work. Understanding these shifts is part of building a comprehensive strategy for your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tacoma hearing office

The Tacoma hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI hearings in Washington. The office maintains a bench of 18 judges on record, reflecting a diverse range of decision-making styles and approval rates. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your files. You can see the Tacoma Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office since 2016. Because approval rates across the office vary significantly—ranging from 30% to 78%—it is important to understand the environment of your specific hearing office.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions