SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Traci M. Hixson

Last decided ClevelandJul 2026
Decisions 4,173since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Traci M. Hixson has a 64% approval rate since 2016, her latest-period approval rate is 70%. This latest-period figure sits 19 points above the Cleveland office average of 51%, 15 points above the state average of 55%, and 12 points above the national average of 58%. These figures are based on a large volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 4,173
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hixson Cleveland National
Approval rate 70% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hixson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hixson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Traci M. Hixson has issued 4,173 decisions. Her approval rate has shown a generally upward trend over the last decade, moving from 53% in 2016 to 70% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date period. While there were fluctuations in the intervening years, the recent data reflects a consistent pattern of approvals. This latest-period performance remains higher than the office-wide average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hixson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

Traci M. Hixson's most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office, which serves claimants across OH. This office maintains a bench of 22 judges, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Cleveland hearing office, there are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 11 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench range from 17% to 70% on their records since 2016. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions