SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Susan Hoffman

SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Los Angeles West Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 3,698 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history provides context for your upcoming hearing, though it is only one factor in your case. Judge Hoffman has maintained a 43% lifetime approval rate, which contrasts with the 63% average seen recently at the Los Angeles West office and the 58% national benchmark. These figures are derived from a docket of 3,698 lifetime decisions, offering a look at past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Hoffman Los Angeles West National
Approval rate 43% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 57%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hoffman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hoffman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 4 years on the bench, your judge's approval rates have fluctuated. After starting with a 50% approval rate in 2016, the data shows a shift to 40% in 2018 before a rise to 44% in 2019. This pattern reflects a period of adjustment in her decision-making approach. The recent data shows a continuation of this steady, cautious pattern of adjudication.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hoffman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles West hearing office

The Los Angeles West hearing office serves a large population in California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 63%, it functions as a hub for regional SSDI hearings. You can expect a review process where medical evidence and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can visit the Los Angeles West Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Los Angeles West hearing office, individual lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 39% to 66%. Because this variation exists, understanding the local landscape is useful, but the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent. The guidance for your preparation is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions