SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard Hopkins

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,736 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Richard Hopkins is based on 2,736 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. This figure sits within the broader 30% to 78% lifetime approval-rate range observed among the 24 judges who have served at the St Louis hearing office. By comparing these figures, you can better understand the statistical landscape of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 2,736

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hopkins. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hopkins's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hopkins
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Richard Hopkins shows a varied approval trend since 2016. After starting with a 58% approval rate, the figures fluctuated through the middle years before showing a recent upward shift in 2024 and 2025. With 2,736 lifetime decisions analyzed, this pattern provides a clear view of how the judge has approached cases over the last decade. The recent uptick in approvals may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented at hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hopkins's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

The St Louis hearing office serves claimants throughout Missouri and the surrounding region. It maintains a bench of 24 judges on record, ensuring that a wide variety of cases are processed daily. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the St Louis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 30% to 78% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions