SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Julianne Hostovich

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 2,965 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While Julianne Hostovich maintains a 42% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period approval rate of 63% sits 14 points above the Pittsburgh office's latest-period average of 49%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a reliable look at recent trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 2,965
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hostovich Pittsburgh National
Approval rate 63% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hostovich's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hostovich
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Julianne Hostovich spans 2,965 lifetime decisions starting in 2017. Her yearly approval trend shows a period of decline followed by a consistent upward trajectory in recent years, with the latest period reflecting a continuation of this steady pattern. This shift suggests that recent case outcomes have trended higher than her long-term average. These patterns are useful for understanding the judge's history, though they do not guarantee future results.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hostovich's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pittsburgh hearing office

The Pittsburgh hearing office serves you if you are a claimant across Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. With a bench of 13 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 49%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, see the Pittsburgh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. The office-wide lifetime approval-rate range spans from 28% to 74%, highlighting the variance you may encounter. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions