SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Katherine Jecklin

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 2,157 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Katherine Jecklin reflect a history of decision-making at the St Louis hearing office. While her lifetime rate stands at 30%, recent data shows a 22% approval rate, which is 29 points lower than the office-wide latest-period average of 51%. These figures are derived from a sample of 2,157 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 30%
Decisions on record 2,157
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Jecklin St Louis National
Approval rate 22% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 12%
Denials 78%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jecklin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jecklin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, Katherine Jecklin has maintained a steady volume of cases, with annual approval rates fluctuating between 23% and 36%. Her record shows a period of relative stability followed by a shift in the latest reporting period. This pattern suggests that while her approach to evidence remains consistent, the outcomes for your claim depend on the specific medical documentation you provide. The latest period reflects a departure from her historical average, which may be influenced by changes in case mix.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jecklin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

The St Louis hearing office serves claimants throughout the Missouri region. With a bench of 24 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You should expect a formal process focused on the medical evidence supporting your disability claim. You can visit the St Louis hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The St Louis hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 24 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 17 currently reporting data. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 30% to 78%, highlighting the importance of being prepared for any assigned judge. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions