SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William E. Kenworthy

Last decided PittsburghSep 2018
Decisions 933since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 53% approval rate for William E. Kenworthy reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which we compare against the 28% to 74% range observed among his peers at the same office. This statistical range provides context for how different judges evaluate evidence.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 933

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kenworthy. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kenworthy's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kenworthy
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for William E. Kenworthy remained steady during his time on record, with 52% in 2016 and 55% in 2017. With 933 total decisions on record since 2016, the data shows a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. While the 2018 data reflects a limited number of decisions, the overall trend suggests a stable pattern of adjudication.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kenworthy's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pittsburgh hearing office

William E. Kenworthy's most recent office on record is the Pittsburgh hearing office, which serves you if you are in Pennsylvania. This office is part of a broader network of hearing locations that handle a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Pittsburgh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 74% on their respective records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions