SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert P. Kingsley

Last decided Tacoma WASep 2016
Decisions 159since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 48% approval rate for Robert P. Kingsley reflects his decisions on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 30% to 78% range observed among other judges at the same office during the same period. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges approach their dockets. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 159

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kingsley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kingsley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kingsley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Robert P. Kingsley covers 159 decisions between January 2016 and September 2016. During this window, the approval rate was 48%. Because this data represents a specific, limited timeframe, it provides a snapshot of the judge's activity during that period. This pattern helps establish a baseline for understanding how evidence and case details were historically evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kingsley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tacoma WA hearing office

The most recent SSA record for Robert P. Kingsley is at the Tacoma WA hearing office, with activity dated through September 2016. This office serves you and other claimants throughout the region and is part of a broader network of hearing offices in Washington. The bench at this location includes 17 judges with varying approval rates on record since 2016. You can see the Tacoma WA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tacoma WA

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tacoma WA office, with approval rates ranging from 30% to 78% since 2016. While these variations exist across the bench, the fundamental process of presenting a strong, evidence-based case remains the same. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions