SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Kovac

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Pittsburgh Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 14,022 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Kovac?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime performance against current office and national benchmarks provides a clearer picture of the local hearing environment. With 14,022 lifetime decisions, Judge Kovac has a significant record that reflects his approach to disability claims. While his lifetime rate is 44%, recent reporting periods show a shift in his decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Kovac Pittsburgh National
Approval rate 44% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 45%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kovac's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kovac
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 8 years on the bench, Judge Kovac has demonstrated an upward trend in his approval rates. Starting at 40% in 2018, his annual approval rate has climbed, reaching 56% in 2025. This recent performance indicates a departure from his earlier decision-making patterns. You can review the Pittsburgh Hearing Office page for more information on local trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kovac's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Kovac? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pittsburgh hearing office

The Pittsburgh Hearing Office manages a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 48%, reflecting the regional landscape of SSDI adjudication. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical documentation and vocational history. See the Pittsburgh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is random. Within the Pittsburgh Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 28% to 57%. This variance highlights why thorough preparation is essential regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing. You can find more information on the Pittsburgh Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions