SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Henry Kramzyk

Last decided NHC ChicagoJul 2026
Decisions 3,072since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to understand how a judge performs relative to their peers. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Henry Kramzyk's 25% approval rate is measured against the NHC Chicago office rate of 54%, the state rate of 54%, and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a clear view of recent activity.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kramzyk NHC Chicago National
Approval rate 25% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 19% — —
Denials 75% — —
Decisions 110 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 29%
Decisions on record 3,072

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kramzyk's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kramzyk
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Henry Kramzyk has issued 3,072 decisions on record. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates reaching 36% in 2024 before settling at 25% over the most recent 12-month window. This recent 25% rate is lower than the 29% average observed across the entire period since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kramzyk's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

The NHC Chicago office serves you across Illinois and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, this office maintains a bench of 19 judges whose most recent record is at this location. You can see the NHC Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the NHC Chicago office, 19 judges have their most recent record here, with 9 of them deciding cases in the latest SSA file. Among these 9 judges, approval rates range from 17% to 88% over the 12-month window.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Kramzyk's 25%. One of them last decided cases in Illinois. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Chicago region and other regions.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Kramzyk and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions