SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael L. Larner

Last decided Des MoinesJul 2026
Decisions 3,214since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 49% approval rate for Michael L. Larner since 2017 provides a broad view of the judge's history, while the latest-period rate of 55% offers insight into more recent activity. These figures are evaluated against the 37% to 70% range observed among the 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Des Moines hearing office. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 3,214
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Larner Des Moines National
Approval rate 55% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 53% — —
Denials 45% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Larner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Larner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, Michael L. Larner has issued 3,214 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with rates ranging from 40% in 2021 to 55% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This latest-period rate of 55% is higher than the long-term average, reflecting a recent shift in outcomes. The data suggests that while your judge's approach has varied over time, the latest period reflects a continuation of this recent upward pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Larner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Des Moines hearing office

The Des Moines hearing office serves you and other claimants across Iowa and the surrounding region. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 53%, you can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Des Moines

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Des Moines hearing office. Approval rates across this bench range from 37% to 70% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions