Lawrence Levey is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the NHC BALTIMORE office. Over 10 years on the bench and 15,161 lifetime decisions, they have maintained a 61% approval rate. This is 12 points above the latest office average and 3 points above the national average. Because case assignment is random, your judge matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Levey's approval rate is calculated from a significant docket of 15,161 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate reached 74%, which stands 12 percentage points above the NHC Baltimore office average and 3 points above the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding his approach to disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Levey's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Levey has seen his approval rates fluctuate, ranging from a low of 49% in 2021 to a high of 73% in 2025. This trend indicates that while his lifetime average remains steady at 61%, his recent decision-making has trended upward compared to the middle years of his tenure. This shift may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented. The recent uptick in approvals suggests a period of increased favorable outcomes for your peers.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Levey's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing scheduled?
About the Nhc Baltimore hearing office
The NHC Baltimore Hearing Office serves applicants throughout Maryland and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of cases. The office-wide latest approval rate currently sits at 49%, providing a local context for your upcoming hearing. You can see the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the NHC Baltimore office, the bench includes 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 46% to 81%. While these rates differ, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the entire office. The guidance for your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
