SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joseph P. Lisiecki III

Last decided OrangeSep 2025
Decisions 3,046since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 58% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a stable baseline derived from 3,046 decisions. When viewed against the 19% to 68% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, this figure helps you contextualize the historical pattern. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 3,046

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lisiecki III. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lisiecki III's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lisiecki III
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Joseph P. Lisiecki III has shown shifts across the 3,046 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of fluctuation, the data indicates a rise in approval rates during 2023 and 2024, followed by a rate of 65% in 2025. These trends are common in long-term data and may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lisiecki III's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orange hearing office

The Orange hearing office is the most recent office on record for Joseph P. Lisiecki III as of September 2025. This office maintains a bench of 12 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orange

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, and their approval rates on record since 2016 range from 19% to 68%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the local bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions