SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert V. Luetkenhaus

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,106 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Robert V. Luetkenhaus are measured against the St Louis hearing office, where judges range from 30% to 78% in lifetime approvals. In the most recent reporting period, his 37% approval rate compares to a 51% office-wide average. These figures rely on a substantial docket of 3,106 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of his record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 35%
Decisions on record 3,106
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Luetkenhaus St Louis National
Approval rate 37% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 29%
Denials 63%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Luetkenhaus's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Luetkenhaus
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval record for Robert V. Luetkenhaus has shown a steady pattern, with annual rates fluctuating between 30% and 53%. After a period of lower approval activity in 2018, the rate has stabilized in recent years, holding at 37% in 2026. This consistency suggests that his approach to evidence and testimony remains predictable. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Luetkenhaus's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

The St Louis hearing office serves claimants throughout Missouri, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office bench consists of 24 judges on record, with a latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can expect a formal process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. For more information, see the St Louis hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The St Louis hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Robert V. Luetkenhaus is essentially random. There are 24 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. With office-wide lifetime approval rates ranging from 30% to 78%, the judge you draw can vary significantly. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions