SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert A. Lynch

Last decided Springfield MOSep 2024
Decisions 1,976since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 51% approval rate for Robert A. Lynch reflects his entire record since 2016, which you can compare against the 25% to 60% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Springfield MO. With 1,976 decisions, this docket provides a stable look at past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 1,976

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lynch. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lynch's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lynch
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert A. Lynch has fluctuated over the years, starting at 45% in 2016 and reaching a peak of 72% in 2023. While the rate dipped to 45% in 2022, the most recent data from 2024 shows a rate of 61%. These shifts often reflect changes in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented. This pattern demonstrates that while the judge has a consistent history, recent trends show a notable variance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lynch's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Springfield MO hearing office

Robert A. Lynch's most recent office on record is the Springfield MO hearing office, which serves you and other claimants across the region. This office is home to a bench of 10 judges with varying approval patterns. You can expect a formal process where the strength of medical evidence is the primary factor in your decision. You can see the Springfield MO hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Springfield MO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. At the Springfield MO office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 25% to 60% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions