SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Candace A. McDaniel

Last decided LouisvilleJul 2026
Decisions 3,722since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 50%, recent performance can differ from this long-term average. The table below provides a breakdown of these figures, including how your judge's latest-period performance compares to the broader office, state, and national benchmarks. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,722
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McDaniel Louisville National
Approval rate 45% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 32% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McDaniel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McDaniel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Candace A. McDaniel has fluctuated across the 3,722 decisions on record since 2016. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 45%, which is a departure from the long-term average. This recent figure reflects a continuation of the variability seen in recent years, where annual approval rates have shifted between 42% and 55%. These patterns may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McDaniel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Louisville hearing office

Candace A. McDaniel's most recent office on record is the Louisville Hearing Office. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges, and the office-wide approval rate for the latest period was 53%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your claim. You can see the Louisville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Louisville

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 7 of them having decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 43% to 75% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions