SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Katherine Morgan

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Portland ME Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 5,763 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Morgan?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Morgan maintains a lifetime approval rate of 79%, which stands 21 percentage points higher than the current national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 5,763 lifetime decisions made during her tenure. By comparing these rates against the Portland ME Hearing Office average of 62%, you can see how her bench activity aligns with broader regional trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Morgan Portland ME National
Approval rate 79% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 67%
Denials 21%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 3 years on the bench, Judge Morgan has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability adjudication. Her yearly trend shows an approval rate of 80% in 2016, 82% in 2017, and 75% in 2018. This pattern reflects a stable decision-making history across thousands of cases. The variation in recent periods is common and often relates to shifts in the complexity of cases presented to the court.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Morgan? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland ME hearing office

The Portland ME Hearing Office serves you throughout Maine, managing a volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges and an office-wide approval rate of 62%, this office handles a diverse range of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a formal process focused on the documentation of your impairments. You can visit the Portland ME Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Portland ME Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 40% to 79%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is useful for your preparation. The guidance for your case remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions