SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. H. Munday

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,645 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While H. Munday maintains a 38% lifetime approval rate, recent data shows a 30% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 12 percentage points lower than the Charlottesville office average of 42% for the same period.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,645
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Munday Charlottesville National
Approval rate 30% 42% 58%
Fully favorable 26%
Denials 70%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Munday's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Munday
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your record for H. Munday shows a relatively steady approval trend, typically hovering between 38% and 41% annually. The most recent reporting period shows a 30% approval rate, which marks a departure from the historical average. This shift may reflect changes in case mix or the specific evidence presented in recent dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Munday's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlottesville hearing office

The Charlottesville hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With 13 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 42%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Charlottesville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is effectively random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom reported in the latest period. Lifetime approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 20% to 82%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions