SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. H. Munday

Last decided CharlottesvilleJul 2026
Decisions 3,645since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While H. Munday has a 38% approval rate on record since 2016, this figure sits within a broader office range of 20% to 82% among the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville. In the latest reporting period, the 30% approval rate reflects a 12-point difference from the office-wide 42% rate. These figures provide a statistical baseline for the office's recent activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,645
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Munday Charlottesville National
Approval rate 30% 42% 58%
Fully favorable 26% — —
Denials 70% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Munday's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Munday
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, H. Munday has issued 3,645 decisions. The yearly trend shows a relatively steady approval rate for much of the record, typically hovering near the 38% average. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date figure of 31% shows a recent shift, this partial data represents a snapshot rather than a long-term change. The latest period reflects a departure from the historical average, which may be influenced by fluctuations in case complexity or the specific evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Munday's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlottesville hearing office

The Charlottesville hearing office serves claimants across Virginia and the surrounding region. With 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 42%. You can expect a formal administrative process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in a favorable outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Charlottesville, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 20% to 82% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions