SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffrey C. Narvil

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Jackson Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,853 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Narvil?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to office and national benchmarks provides a clear view of their historical decision-making. Judge Narvil's 45% lifetime approval rate is derived from a substantial docket of 21,853 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate was 47%. These figures provide a baseline for understanding the judicial environment at the Jackson office.

Metric Judge Narvil Jackson National
Approval rate 45% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Narvil's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Narvil
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Narvil has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. His yearly approval rates have fluctuated, reaching 39% in 2023 and 50% in 2025. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented. The recent data suggests a return to his long-term average, indicating a stable decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Narvil's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Narvil? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jackson hearing office

The Jackson Hearing Office manages a high volume of disability cases for local applicants. With a bench of 4 judges, the office maintains a steady pace of hearings. The office-wide latest approval rate currently stands at 55%, reflecting the broader judicial climate in this location. You can visit the Jackson Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Jackson Hearing Office, the 4 judges on the bench have lifetime approval rates ranging from 45% to 60%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the hearing room, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions