Wynne O'Brien-Persons is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Reno hearing office with a lifetime approval rate of 56% over 15,751 decisions. This rate is 2 percentage points below the national average of 58%. While recent trends show a 54% approval rate, these figures represent past performance rather than a prediction for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for the hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge O'Brien-Persons currently holds a 54% approval rate, which is 4 percentage points below the Reno office average and 2 points below the national average. With a career spanning 15,751 decisions, this judge has a significant track record that helps define the local hearing environment.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Brien-Persons's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, Judge O'Brien-Persons has seen shifts in approval patterns. After maintaining rates near 70% during the early years of your tenure, the data shows a transition to a lower range starting around 2020. The most recent period shows a slight upward trend, moving from 50% in 2023 to 54% in 2025. This recent activity suggests a stabilization in decision-making that aligns more closely with the judge's long-term career average.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Brien-Persons's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge O'Brien-Persons? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Reno hearing office
The Reno Hearing Office serves you across Nevada, managing a high volume of cases to address regional disability needs. With a team of 5 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal environment where the quality of medical documentation remains the primary factor in a successful outcome.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. The Reno office features a diverse bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 27% to 56%. Because every judge interprets evidence differently, understanding the office-wide landscape is helpful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
