SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Wynne O'Brien-Persons

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Reno Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 15,751 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge O'Brien-Persons?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge O'Brien-Persons currently holds a 54% approval rate, which is 4 percentage points below the Reno office average and 2 points below the national average. With a career spanning 15,751 decisions, this judge has a significant track record that helps define the local hearing environment.

Metric Judge O'Brien-Persons Reno National
Approval rate 56% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Brien-Persons's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Brien-Persons
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge O'Brien-Persons has seen shifts in approval patterns. After maintaining rates near 70% during the early years of your tenure, the data shows a transition to a lower range starting around 2020. The most recent period shows a slight upward trend, moving from 50% in 2023 to 54% in 2025. This recent activity suggests a stabilization in decision-making that aligns more closely with the judge's long-term career average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Brien-Persons's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge O'Brien-Persons? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Reno hearing office

The Reno Hearing Office serves you across Nevada, managing a high volume of cases to address regional disability needs. With a team of 5 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal environment where the quality of medical documentation remains the primary factor in a successful outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. The Reno office features a diverse bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 27% to 56%. Because every judge interprets evidence differently, understanding the office-wide landscape is helpful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions