SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marie Palachuk

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Spokane Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,909 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Palachuk?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both lifetime averages and recent trends. Judge Palachuk's lifetime approval rate of 48% is based on 22,909 lifetime decisions. In the latest reporting period, her 50% approval rate sits 10 percentage points below the national average of 58%. These rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

Metric Judge Palachuk Spokane National
Approval rate 48% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Palachuk's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Palachuk
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 10 years on the bench, Judge Palachuk has presided over 22,909 lifetime decisions. Her yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, starting at 57% in 2016 and reaching a low of 35% in 2022 before trending to 50% in 2025. This recent shift suggests a return toward her historical average after a period of lower approval rates. These patterns reflect the judge's consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the past decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Palachuk's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Palachuk? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Spokane hearing office

The Spokane Hearing Office serves claimants across Washington and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a significant volume of disability claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 72%, which provides context for local outcomes. You can visit the Spokane Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. Across the Spokane Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 48% to 78%. Because assignment is outside your control, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions