SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joanna Papazekos

Last decided PittsburghJul 2026
Decisions 3,150since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the 57% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, the latest-period approval rate of 62% offers insight into more recent trends. These figures are supported by a volume of 3,150 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,150
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Papazekos Pittsburgh National
Approval rate 62% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 55% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Papazekos's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Papazekos
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Joanna Papazekos has shown movement since 2016. With 3,150 total decisions on record, the latest reporting period shows a 62% approval rate, which is 13 percentage points above the office average, 8 percentage points above the state average, and 4 percentage points above the national average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Papazekos's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Pittsburgh hearing office

Joanna Papazekos's most recent office on record is the Pittsburgh hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office maintains a diverse bench with varying approval patterns.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Pittsburgh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 28% to 74% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions