SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nathaniel Plucker

Last decided St LouisJul 2026
Decisions 2,556since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While Nathaniel Plucker has an approval rate of 54% across all decisions on record since 2016, recent performance shows a 60% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 9 percentage points above the St Louis office average of 51%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable basis for comparison.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 2,556
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Plucker St Louis National
Approval rate 60% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Plucker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Plucker
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Nathaniel Plucker has issued 2,556 decisions. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 51% in 2016, 51% in 2017, 56% in 2018, 52% in 2019, 54% in 2020, 53% in 2021, 55% in 2022, 60% in 2023, 59% in 2024, 63% in 2025, and 60% in 2026. The latest period, which includes 154 decisions, shows a 60% approval rate, suggesting that recent decision-making remains consistent with this trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Plucker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Louis hearing office

Nathaniel Plucker's most recent office on record is the St Louis hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Missouri region and maintains a bench of 20 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 51%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Louis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Louis office, 13 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 30% to 78% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions