SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bernard Porter

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,788 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating your chances requires looking at the data in context. Bernard Porter’s lifetime approval rate of 44% sits within the broader Jacksonville office range of 33% to 78%. In the most recent reporting period, his 53% approval rate tracks 2 points above the office-wide average of 51%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a reliable statistical foundation.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,788
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Porter Jacksonville National
Approval rate 53% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 45%
Denials 47%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Porter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Porter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Bernard Porter has maintained a steady decision record. While his approval rate has fluctuated year-to-year, the trend shows a notable increase in recent periods, moving from 41% in 2021 to 53% in 2026. This recent activity suggests a shift in the outcomes of cases heard in his courtroom. Understanding this trajectory is helpful, as the latest period reflects a continuation of this upward trend in approvals.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Porter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jacksonville hearing office

The Jacksonville hearing office serves you across northern Florida, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 17 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Jacksonville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 78% over their respective careers.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions