SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. MaryKay Rauenzahn

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,021 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While MaryKay Rauenzahn maintains a 61% lifetime approval rate, her most recent reporting period shows a 44% approval rate, which sits 14 percentage points below the current Eugene office average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 3,021 lifetime decisions, providing a stable basis for analysis. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,021
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Rauenzahn Eugene National
Approval rate 44% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 56%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rauenzahn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Rauenzahn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, MaryKay Rauenzahn has maintained a consistent record, with yearly approval rates generally fluctuating between 53% and 67%. While the most recent data shows a temporary dip to 44%, her long-term history suggests a steady approach to case evaluation. This pattern indicates that the judge's decision-making is grounded in a substantial volume of cases, helping to smooth out year-to-year volatility. The recent shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality rather than a fundamental change in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rauenzahn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Eugene hearing office

The Eugene hearing office serves you throughout Oregon, operating as a key hub for the region's disability adjudication. The office maintains a diverse bench of 11 judges on record, with a latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a formal process where the quality of medical evidence remains the primary driver of the outcome. See the Eugene Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Eugene hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. With lifetime approval rates across the bench ranging from 32% to 81%, the specific judge you draw can influence the context of your hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions