SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joyce Frost-Wolf

On record 3,677 decisions since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. Joyce Frost-Wolf's lifetime approval rate of 41% sits within the broader Tacoma office range of 30% to 78%. In the most recent reporting period, your judge's approval rate was 46%, compared to the office-wide latest-period rate of 58%. These figures are based on a volume of 3,677 lifetime decisions.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 3,677
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Frost-Wolf Tacoma National
Approval rate 46% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 27%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Frost-Wolf's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Frost-Wolf
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Joyce Frost-Wolf spans from 2017 to 2026, showing a varied yearly trend. After an initial period of fluctuation, the approval rate saw an uptick in 2019 before dipping in 2020, followed by a recovery in recent years. The latest-period approval rate of 46% remains consistent with the judge's long-term activity. This pattern suggests that while your case outcome depends on your specific evidence, the judge's overall approach has remained steady over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Frost-Wolf's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tacoma hearing office

The Tacoma hearing office serves you throughout the Washington region. With a bench of 18 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Tacoma Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates among these peers vary significantly, ranging from 30% to 78% over their respective lifetime records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions